Picture
This would be my final essay for English Composition II.
It was requested that I post it, so I have. Enjoy.


Any time a new book series emerges that sweeps the nation and blows sales
figures out of the water, it makes sense that one would take a second look at
what exactly is being read, or what the author of said series is doing to so
enrapture their demographic. It happened when the Harry Potter series reached
 its peak, and occurred again when Dan Brown’s The DaVinci Code was firmly
 grasped in the hands of millions. Both book series and their respective films
caused their own controversy, with people protesting Harry Potter due to the
portrayal of witchcraft in the series and people opposing The DaVinci Code
along with Angels and Demons due to the claims the books made about the
church and religion. During the past several years, however, there has been a
new series on the rise, one that many claim trumps both of those previously
mentioned. While the target audience is much smaller and specialized than
JK Rowling’s or Dan Brown’s was, it is strong and it is vigilant. It is also,
unfortunately, extremely susceptible to the ideas in which the series it loves
places so much emphasis on. It is a demographic being shaped by the media
surrounding it as it matures, and in some cases, Stephanie Meyer and her
Twilight saga are doing a lot more than providing teenage girls with a “fun”
book series to read on the school bus when they don’t feel like thinking about
how mean real boys are or how boring algebra class is. 

When asked why they read Twilight or enjoy watching the Twilight movie, there
was a general pattern that emerged among young girls. The series follows Bella
 Swan, the new girl in town, and her love affair with Edward Cullen, the dark,
brooding vampire that is oh-so dangerous but is completely infatuated with
Bella as well; it is said brooding vampire that has these girls in such a
maddening frenzy. In her article “What Girls Want: An Edward Cullen to Love
Them” for the website Townhall.com, Dr. Miriam Grossman spoke to several
girls and asked them why exactly this was. Nava, age fourteen, explained, “He’s
 cute, and he’s really nice to Bella.” Kayla, age 16, claimed, “He’s caring, and
genuine. He expresses his love, and risks his life to protect her. And he’s
handsome.” Tanya, age 19, continued to elaborate on the same idea, stating,
“Edward loves Bella and wants to be with her forever, so he controls himself.
 The self-discipline is very hard on him, but seeing her hurt would be even
worse” (Grossman). The general idea about Edward Cullen gathered from these
 statements would make it very understandable why young girls find him
appealing; he’s caring, genuine, self-sacrificing, and good looking on top of
that. What is there not to like?

Unfortunately, there are many qualities about Edward Cullen and his
relationship with Bella Swan that not only answer that question, but provide
 an unsettling set of new questions regarding the readers that seem to think
that he’s the overall “perfect guy”. When going down the list of characteristics
 in a typical abusive relationship, Edward matches up with more than a few,
including but not limited to: making you feel like you are unable to make
decisions, using threats to gain compliance, tracking your whereabouts,
preventing you from seeing your friends and family, and being generally
jealous and possessive (Batignani). He also withholds sex and other forms of
intimate contact with Bella, and when they do finally have sex, despite the fact
that she wakes up covered in bruises due to the violence of it all, the only thing
 Bella cares about is whether or not Edward enjoyed the act. This behavior by
the series protagonist leads to the final, and possibly most disturbing, point of
 all. For a book series that is penned by a woman and loved by an audience
that is made up primarily of women, the female protagonist is awfully weak.
Bella is constantly dependant on a male figure to make herself content and
stable, and seems to have no desire in her life other than loving Edward, being
with Edward, and making sure that Edward is happy. She is weak and frail, and
 needs “rescued” by the capable, strong men in her life on more than one
occasion. For a book series that young women flock to, this is all highly
unsettling. Stephanie Meyers’s Twilight saga preaches unhealthy relationships
 and stereotypically anti-feminist values, all the while justifying this by
wrapping it up in a pretty, sparkling package and calling it “love”.

From the first moment that Edward meets Bella, he warns her that he is
dangerous; in the film he comes right out and tells her, “If you're smart, you'll
stay away from me” (IMDB). Now, if Edward were simply a brooding “bad boy”,
then the appeal of this angst fueled attempt to distance himself from Bella
might be slightly understandable and forgivable. In fact, studies have
legitimately shown that girls are more often than not attracted to bad,
dangerous boys. In the article, “Why Nice Guys Finish Last” on the ABC News
website, Dr. Peter Jonason, lead investigator in a study on whether women
really do prefer more “dangerous” men states, “…We think women would avoid
 these kinds of men, but what we show is counterintuitive -- that women are
attracted to these bad boys and they do pretty well in terms of sheer numbers
 of sexual partners” (Grayson). The study performed was based on certain
traits that were found in typical “bad boys”, including callousness, impulsive
 behavior, extreme extroversion, and narcissism; two of which Edward Cullen
 matches up with (Grayson). So if Edward were simply another “bad boy” that
 was a little callous and impulsive, it would be understandable that young
girls are flocking to him. He is a challenge, he is non-accessible; something
that automatically makes him desired. On top of this, as the young readers
above mentioned, Edward is very attractive and seems highly devoted to Bella.

Edward Cullen, however, is more than the typical “bad boy” and therein lies the
 problem with his massive appeal to young women. Later in the first Twilight
film, as he and Bella discuss Edward’s true nature as a vampire and his carnal
 desire to kill her and drink her blood, he explains, “I'm the world's most
dangerous predator. Everything about me invites you in. My voice, my face,
even my smell. As if I would need any of that. As if you could outrun me. As if
you could fight me off” (IMDB). He also randomly appears in her bedroom one
 night; she wakes up to him standing at the foot of her bed watching her sleep.
 When she asks him if he does this often he replies, “Just the past couple of
months. I like watching you sleep. I find it fascinating” (IMDB). There is another
 scene where she is almost attacked by a gang late at night, and Edward, who
later admits that he had been following her to make sure she wasn’t in trouble,
 randomly shows up and becomes so enraged by what the men were intending
to do that he verbally lashes out at Bella once or twice in the car. His behavior
 would seem somewhat heroic and tender, if it wasn’t so possessive and
creepy. He follows her and watches over her as though he owns her, when they
 really aren’t even that close of friends. Instead of taking Bella out to dinner
and a movie, he takes her to a forest where he rips trees out of the ground in
an attempt to try and intimidate her, to scare her with a display of force and
power. To make things even worse, there is an underlying finality about the
relationship between Edward and Bella; an indication that if either of them
should lose each other their lives would be over completely. In the second
book in the Twilight saga, New Moon, Edward tells Bella, “I thought I'd
explained it clearly before. Bella, I can't live in a world where you don't exist”
 (Squidoo). Likewise, in the Twilight film Bella states, “I can't bring myself to
regret the decisions that brought me face to face with death. They also brought
 me to Edward” (IMDB). For a series whose target audience is teenage girls and
 whose heroin is sixteen herself, these are some pretty bold statements. Clearly
, despite all of the crazy and troubling behavior, Bella feels that she is in love
 with Edward, and wants nothing but to be by his side. This is highly troubling,
 as it seems to be implying to girls who are just learning how to date and
develop relationships that it’s alright to stay with someone who may be highly
 dangerous, as long as you really think you might possibly love each other. 

The volatile and unhealthy relationship between Bella and Edward is only half
 of the issue when it comes to women’s rights and a misrepresentation of
gender roles in the Twilight series. Bella Swan, the protagonist, is essentially
the perfect little Stepford Wife girlfriend. She is weak, meek, and seems to
confuse the words love and dependency more than once throughout the books
and in the film. There is the issue of sex, for example. Edward refuses to have
sex with Bella until the final book due to his immense strength and the fear
that he will harm her, and up until then is hesitant to even kiss her or show her
 affection, as he may lose control and decide to eat her. When they do finally
have sex, after they are married in the final installment of the saga, it is
exceptionally violent, and Bella wakes up the next morning covered in bruises.
 When they discuss it, their conversation goes as follows:

“Assumed? Did you expect this, Bella? Were you anticipating that I would hurt
you? Were you thinking it would be worse? Do you consider the experiment a
success because you can walk away from it? No broken bones—that equals a
victory?” I waited, letting him get it all out. Then I waited some more while his
breathing went back to normal. When his eyes were calm, I answered,
speaking with slow precision. “I didn’t know what to expect—but I definitely
did not expect how…how…just wonderful and perfect it was.” My voice
dropped to a whisper, my eyes slipped from his face down to my hands. “I
mean, I don’t know how it was for you, but it was like that for me.” (Meyer,
Breaking 92)

Instead of being angry or even somewhat bothered by the fact that her first real
 sexual experience reduced her to being covered in bruises, Bella simply
accepts it and is grateful for the experience regardless because of her love for
Edward. What kind of message does this send to the millions of young girls
reading these books? While the idea of love surpassing all sounds wonderfully
 poetic, it should never surpass domestic abuse, in any form. In an article
discussing domestic abuse among high school and college students, Dr. Sandra
 
Stith, a nationally recognized domestic violence expert, states that about 30%
of college students have been in relationships that involve physical
aggression, while more have been in relationships that are emotionally
abusive, and 25% of high school students have been in abusive relationships
 (Associated Content). Obviously there are many factors that contribute to this
 and it would be absurd to say that a book series is a primary reason for
domestic abuse among young people, but providing female characters in
popular young adult literature that so opening welcome abuse certainly isn’t
helping. But of course, Bella doesn’t say anything to protest this or defend
herself, as that would put her at risk of upsetting and or losing Edward.

This leads to the final point, and perhaps root of most of the issues regarding
 these characters; Bella seems completely dependent on men to be happy,
without any other real interests or goals for herself. In the second installment
 in the series, New Moon, Edward leaves Bella, at which point she instantly
throws herself into the arms of her childhood best friend Jacob. There is a
passage when Jacob and Bella are first developing their friendship after
Edward leaves that was particularly troubling; the two are fixing motorcycles
 together and Bella offers Jacob money to help pay for parts. When he begins
 to protest she states, “’I’ve got some money saved. College fund, you know.’
College, schmollege, I thought to myself. It wasn’t like I’d saved up enough to go
 anywhere special—and besides, I had no desire to leave Forks anyway”
(Meyer, New 136). What does Bella plan on doing with her life then, if she
intends on blowing her college fund on motorcycle parts to win over a
rebound boyfriend and staying in her hometown? What goals does she have?
What type of message is Stephanie Meyer trying to send? Not to mention that
where Edward matches up with the characteristics of an abusive partner, Bella
 matches up with those of a typical codependent one. Codependency
Personality Disorder is characterized by living through or for another, and
some of the symptoms exhibited by Bella include an
inability to see
alternatives to situations, impulsiveness, overacting to change,
feeling different, lack of self confidence, and fear of abandonment
(Recovery-Man). 

There is an often overused quote by Franklin Roosevelt that states, “Great
power involves great responsibility” (Good Reads). The power to completely
 consume the minds and hearts of young girls around the world is not only
great, it is something that should be handled with extreme care. Stephanie
Meyer has made massive amounts of money with her series, selling out movie
 theaters and packing midnight book releases. With this in mind, it is a shame
 that she did not consider more deeply the potential impact that her words
would have on the world. Why not write a series with an empowering female
protagonist? Or one that promotes healthy relationships? As Amy Clarke, an
undergraduate professor at the University of California stated in an article for
the Washington Post, "Do we really want our daughters reading books about a
 girl like Bella who is always needing to be saved, who is willing to give up her
 mortality for a boy?" (Yao). Truth be told, Twilight is just another work of
fiction, and if read with the mature realization that the relationship between
Edward and Bella is just about as logical and healthy as undead vampires that
 sparkle, it is perfectly harmless. However, whether or not most of Meyers’
 young fan base is reading with that sort of intuitive knowledge, something
that the obsession over the “perfection” that is Edward Cullen seems to argue,
is left to be determined.
 

SOURCES

+ Associated Content. September 13th, 2007. November 17, 2009. < http://www.associatedcontent
 com/article/377942/domestic_violence_among
_high_school.html>

+ Batignani, Renee. “Abusive Relationships”. Conseulers for Women.com.
November 17, 2009.
http://www.counselorsforwomen.com/abusive_
relationships.htm

+ Good Reads. 2009.
http://www.goodreads.com/quotes/show/135379

+ Grayson, Audrey. “Why Nice Guys Finish Last”. ABC News.com. June 19th,
2008. November 17,
2009. http://abcnews.go.com/Health/story?id=519753
1&page=2


+ Grossman, Miriam. “What Girls Want: An Edward Cullen to Love”. Townhall.
com
. December
8th, 2008. November 17, 2009. < http://townhall.com/columnists/DrMiriamGrossmanMD/2008/12/08/what_girls_
want_an_edward_cullen_to_love_them?page=1>

+ Internet Movie Database
. < http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1099212/quotes>

+
Meyer, Stephanie. Breaking Dawn. New York: Little, Brown and Company. 2008
. Print.

+
Meyer, Stephanie. New Moon. New York: Hachette Book Company. 2006. Print.

+
Recovery-Man. “Characteristics of Codependency”. November 15th, 2007.
November 17, 2009.
http://www.recovery-man.com/coda/symptoms.htm

+ Squidoo.com
. 2009. November 17, 2009. http://www.squidoo.com/cullenabuse

+ Yao, Laura. “Bitten and Smitten”. Washington-Post.com. August 1st, 2008.
November 17th,
2009. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/story/20
08/08/01/ST2008080100930.html
 


Comments

Shawna

Tue, 17 Nov 2009 15:40:29

Sarah this was an amazing article that you wrtoe

 

Eliza

Tue, 17 Nov 2009 21:08:27

I loved this. As a feminist myself, I have so many problems with the Twilight series and the relationship between Bella and Edward. You perfectly articulated the issues surrounding the series.

 

Megathy

Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:40:18

Generally I agree with this. But.

"What does Bella plan on doing with her life then, if she intends on blowing her college fund on motorcycle parts to win over a rebound boyfriend and staying in her hometown?"

That part is wrong. She plans on staying in Forks so that Edward will no where to find her if he comes back. Which I think is even more terrifying in itself. It's not even for a rebound boyfriend, it's for a guy she's so dependent on, even after he totally abandons her, she won't leave.

 

Wed, 18 Nov 2009 07:45:11

Excellent point, Megathy, I can't believe I overlooked that.

 

Wed, 18 Nov 2009 11:26:11

Did you really turn this in with Stephenie Meyer's name spelled wrong every single time? It's a dumb spelling but it's a correct one.

Also, I don't see what's so wrong with being a feminist and a Twilight fan, because for every girl barfing to look like Doutzen Kroes and wanting a controlling boyfriend like Edward Cullen, there's at least one other young feminist laughing at the thought of that and reading Bust. Girls aren't (always) as stupid and moldable as people portray them.

 

Wed, 18 Nov 2009 13:50:32

I obviously must have, Willa. Then again, I also wrote this between 12:30am and 10:00am Tuesday, so I'm pretty pleased that I managed to construct a sentence given that, and doubt my professor is going to notice and/or care either way. Nor do I, for that matter.

As for your second point, to each their own. As I said in the last few sentences, there's nothing wrong with reading Twilight as long as you're able to make somewhat educated choices yourself; I know many women that do both things. However, my general point was that I find it troubling that so many girls look at Edward Cullen as this "ideal" or model of perfection...because lets face it, he's abusive and Bella is weak and codependent. It's a pretty disgusting thing to aspire for, in my opinion, and for a series that has made such an impact, it would've been nice if Meyer would have preached something other than stereotypical meek codependency and abuse.

 

Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:53:31

The reason that Meyers wrote Bella how she is, is because of her own personal values. She's Mormon, and this is how she thinks women really should be. That's the scary part. She DID think about the impact she would/does have on the world --and she feels she wrote the character perfectly and that Bella is an excellent model for young girls. It makes me cringe that there are still people (women!) invested in driving women back to the dark ages.

 

Wed, 18 Nov 2009 21:00:39

Oh, and to respond to Willa's comment:

The books are YA literature, aimed at girls between the ages of 10/11 (if they have a high reading level, like many do) to 16. At this age many girls don't know a lot about feminism and middle and high schools rarely teach (or succeed in teaching) critical thinking.

This is also the age where people are imitating and exploring as a way of finding what "works" for them. Models of what Meyer portrays as "romance" are unhealthy for anyone, and takes the unhealthy modeling we see in the media and things like princess films to the next level. Girls already expect to fall "madly in love" with their prince charming and be "together forever" at that age (we've all been there), and this only reinforces that and the dangerous ways it could play out.

Yes, many older women reading/watching this have the life experience, wisdom, critical thinking skills, and knowledge to question it and view it as entertainment. But younger women have little to none of this, and it is leading them to think the world should be something that it very much shouldn't be.

 

Desiree

Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:44:02

 

Desiree

Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:54:28

First of all, Mormon women are far from codependent Bellas - nor do we believe women should be the way Bella was described in the article. We have a history and heritage of strong women involved in service, personal sacrifice for the greater good and a strong sense to stand for what we believe in. We are encouraged in our belief system to be self-sufficient, seek education and to be free thinkers and to strengthen our homes and communities.

Secondly, and in response to this article, I don't agree with every aspect of the series, but I do find it refreshing, that in a market flooded with feminist heroes, one girl dares to be the old school princess tripping on her skirts - who later in the series, if you continue to read, becomes a remarkably strong and stand- on-her-own-two-feet-and-saves-everyone-she-loves character. She starts off as stumbly and obsessed and grows into something strong and stand alone. How's that for feminist? I think as women, and especially as women of character and strength, we need to stop jumping onto the bandwagon of finger-pointing political correctness and accept our softer sides and find strength in beauty, and beauty in strength - recognize that sometimes we are soft and squishy. And sometimes men are too. And to accept someone's hand, even a man's (gasp), is okay. I often feel that we live in a society where women are expected to do or have it all- the top position in a job, the kids, the magazine feature home, the talent and abs and do-it-yourself-iness, and to be phenomenal at it all, and I believe this to be a great disservice to women. Shouldn't we be teaching acceptance of self instead of defining women and fitting the mold over every girl we meet? Is it our right to forge the delicate porcelain parts of our beings (both men and women) into steel? I think we should shake off the definitions placed upon us and define ourselves by being a woman, not a feminist or a princess or a diva or a female dog. We are women. How dare you try and sweep us into a generalized statement. (How dare I!) We perpetuate the problem when we ourselves attempt to mold each woman, or story of one, into the one we think they should be. Women come in all temperaments, geometries, passions - with different capacities for growth and learning. I am infuriated when someone tries to force a woman into their own desired mold. Let a girl grow into what they may, with the opportunities available to them to get to whatever level they achieve, to do so with an eye slanted to being the best, and with the strength and support of our community to encourage them to grow into whatever woman they wish to be. So, yes, it is refreshing to sink into a book with a princess tripping on her dress with no worries but someone to love. A fairy tale with a grumpy beast (hmm, Disney's Beauty and the Beast might also be up for discussion on this forum, or The Little Mermaid's relationship with her Father, or, well, out of this pause and back to the grumpy beast) and an awkward teenage girl with hormones pumping, parents askew in life and a vampire/werewolf love triangle. And bravo for a man holding onto his hormones and not taking what a girl is offering for once. Would it really be acceptable for him (built to be irresistable as above mentioned in your article) to take Bella? Is being responsible, or refusing sex until one is married, now considered abusive? I am astounded that it should be listed as such. I do agree that Edward has great character flaws - ones I would not like to see walking in on the arm of my daughter; but we're talking about vampires dating humans and the strain in that. Bella also becomes headoverheels can't eat and sleep in love, and I think this can be an accurate portrayal of some teenage girls. To pretend girls (and boys) don't ever act like this is dishonest. Some women can be strong, independent and amazingly stupid in love. It's interesting to note that Bella also prepares meals for herself and father, and her mother is painted as flighty and, perhaps, not too stable - the daughter seems to act as caretaker on some levels to her parents - is that okay? In some points, when laundry-listed, Edward and Bella can line up as a classic abusive relationship, however, some of the ingredients to cake match with the ingredients to potato soup. Add in the rest of the stuff to the flour, butter and salt and everything works together to make a great dessert of a story. And, honestly, it has vampires and werewolves in it - enjoy it with a grain of salt. I am grateful for the raise of alarmbells so that perhaps a conversation (between parents and the children reading this series) can begin regarding the true nature of a healthy relationship and the fantasy of one involving a penned character.

I am surprised that there was not a greater outcry in the article that this series (aimed for an audience of preteens) ends in a book that becomes considerably

 

Desiree

Sun, 22 Nov 2009 19:58:21

(and decidely so) more adult.

 

yep

Thu, 17 Dec 2009 23:02:55

have you every read Shakespeare? Romeo and Juliet is one of the greatest literary pieces ever written (argumentivtley, of course). but many believe so, and it is known across the world by millions as a "true love story"

but closely analyzed, it is a mere story of teenage infatuation. romeo and juliet do not even know eachother, but "fall in love". they merely scratch the surface, just like bella and edward. actually, i think bella and edward know more about eachother than romeo and juliet. and juliets the one who died for this boy she barely knew for more than like 72 hours.


so how can romeo and juliet be one of the greatest thigns ever written? and twilight is garbage?
it has exactly the same principal behind it

 

Kelly

Fri, 18 Dec 2009 02:58:12

@yep:

If you study Shakespeare, Romeo & Juliet wasn't really meant to be a love story but a tragedy exploring the consequences of the feud between two families, and the impact it had on their neglected children.

W.S. knew what infatuation was, and yes, it sold - but the idea of Romeo and Juliet as the perfect couple is due to the simple fact that most people don't understand the play.

As for Twilight... let's put it this way, Stephanie Meyer is no Shakespeare.

 



Leave a Reply